For Reviewer
How to Become a Reviewer
The Academic International Journal of Veterinary Medicine (AIJVM) welcomes qualified scholars and researchers to join its pool of peer reviewers. Reviewers play a critical role in safeguarding the quality, credibility, and scholarly integrity of the journal.
Eligibility Criteria
Prospective reviewers should:
- Hold a doctoral degree or be an established researcher in a relevant field of the Veterinary Medicine.
- Demonstrate recognized academic expertise, evidenced by publications in peer-reviewed journals
- Have research interests aligned with the aims and scope of AIJVM
- Be committed to conducting ethical, objective, and timely peer reviews
Reviewer Registration Process
Researchers who wish to serve as reviewers must register through the journal’s online submission system.
To register:
- Visit the reviewer registration page:
https://aijvm.aipublishers.org/index.php/aijvm/user/register - Complete the registration form with accurate personal and academic information
- During registration, select the option:
“Yes, I would like to be contacted with requests to review submissions to this journal.” - Clearly indicate your Reviewing Interests, specifying your academic fields, research expertise, and methodological competencies
- Submit the registration form and ensure that your profile information remains up to date
Reviewer Selection
- Reviewers are selected by the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors based on academic expertise and stated reviewing interests
- Review invitations are issued according to manuscript relevance and reviewer availability
- Reviewers may accept or decline invitations depending on expertise, workload, or potential conflicts of interest
Reviewer Guidelines
- Reviewer Responsibilities and Ethics
- Provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback on assigned manuscripts
- Focus evaluations on scientific quality, originality, clarity, and relevance
- Treat manuscripts as strictly confidential
- Deliver respectful, professional feedback aimed at improving scholarly quality
- Evaluation Criteria
- Originality: Does the study offer new insights or knowledge?
- Methodological rigor: Are the methods appropriate and clearly explained?
- Relevance: Is the manuscript aligned with the journal’s scope?
- Clarity and structure: Is the manuscript well organized and clear?
- References: Are citations accurate, current, and relevant?
- Confidentiality Guidelines
- All manuscripts are confidential and must not be shared without editorial permission
- Reviewers must not contact authors directly at any stage
- Conflict of Interest Declaration
- Reviewers must decline manuscripts with personal, professional, or financial conflicts
- Conflicts may include institutional affiliation, recent collaboration, or any relationship affecting impartiality
Recognition of Reviewers
AIJVM acknowledges reviewers by:
- Providing official reviewer certificates upon request
- Offering formal acknowledgment of reviewer service (with consent)
- Supporting academic and professional service records


